CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-01

Grounded Optimization: A Layered Engineering Framework for Reducing LLM Hallucination in Automated Personal Document Rewriting

Shashank Indukuri, Adarsh Agrawal

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to resume optimization for applicant tracking systems, introducing hallucination failures distinct from general text generation: anachronistic technology injection, cross-domain terminology contamination, structural mutation, and content fabrication. We present Grounded Optimization, a five-layer framework combining temporal context validation, deterministic contamination detection, structural invariant enforcement, prompt-level grounding, and an evaluator agent. In ablation experiments across three LLMs, four temperature settings, and six layer configurations on 25 synthetic resumes spanning 14 industries, undefended baselines produce 2.48-5.36 detected hallucinations per resume. Among detectors independent of the active defenses, temporal hallucinations are reduced by 50-95% across all conditions; overall detected hallucination rate falls to 0.04-0.24. Prompt-level grounding alone achieves zero detected hallucinations at low temperature with a capable instruction-following model; higher temperatures and weaker models reveal the need for the deterministic layers as a complement. We release the contamination taxonomy, evaluation code, and raw data.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.IRcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-31

RecHarness: A Bandit-Routed Agentic Harness for Self-Evolving Recommender Systems

Haoran Ling, Yuecheng Li, Zeyu Song, Jing Yao, Shuwen Kang, Chi Lu, et al.

Optimizing modern recommender models still depends heavily on engineers manually iterating over architectural, objective, and training-strategy changes. While LLM-based agents can automate this trial-and-error process, allowing the LLM to both select modification directions and g…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-23

Agentic coding without the cloud: evaluating open-weight large language models on longitudinal data preparation tasks

Mack Nixon, Liam Wright, Yevgeniya Kovalchuk, Alison Fang-Wei Wu, Martin Danka, Andy Boyd, et al.

Large language models (LLMs) and agents are now widely used tools in code development, with data typically sent to third-party cloud-based models. Their adoption in research using personal data is constrained by governance requirements that typically prohibit data transmission to…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-31

ARB: A Matched Authorship-Rewriting Benchmark Dataset for AI-Text Detector Evaluation

Gaetano Perrone, Simon Pietro Romano

Standard AI-text detection benchmarks compare human-written text against text generated directly by large language models (LLMs). While prior work has shown that rewriting and paraphrasing can degrade detector performance, it remains unclear whether performance measured on this c…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.HCcs.MAcs.SE2026-07-23

HiMe: Real-Time Self-Hosted Personal Agent Platform for Health Insights with Wearable Devices

Wei Liu, Siya Qi, Linhai Zhang, Lorainne Tudor Car, Yulan He

Traditional approaches to wearable health signal analysis, such as smartwatches, are constrained by rigid analytical frameworks and limited personalisation. The emergence of LLM agents creates a new opportunity for Personal Health Agentic Analysis, where health insights can be ge…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-23

Training Large Language Models for Self-Explanation Faithfulness

Yeoktatt Cheah, María Pérez-Ortiz, Noah Y. Siegel, Oana-Maria Camburu

We propose a Reinforcement Learning (RL) method to directly optimize the faithfulness of self-explanations - the extent to which a model's generated reasoning accurately reflects its internal decision-making process. While existing work focuses on evaluating faithfulness or using…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-24

From Isolated Tasks to Structured Capabilities: A Multilayer Taxonomy for Large Language Models

Shixin Fang, Jiachen Wo, Wenjuan Qin, Sihang Jiang, Yanghua Xiao

Large language model (LLM) evaluation spans diverse tasks and benchmarks, yet evidence remains organized around tasks rather than the capabilities they probe. This fragmentation limits cross-study comparison, obscures capabilities tasks recruit, and makes coverage gaps difficult…

View free PDFSource page