CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-11

Behavioural Signatures of Risk-Sensitive Decision-Making in Large Language Models

Xuankun Rong, Wenke Huang, Bo Du, Dacheng Tao, Mang Ye

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in decision support, it is important to understand whether their choices under uncertainty exhibit stable and interpretable behavioural regularities. Human decision-making combines relatively persistent risk preferences with context-dependent adjustment, yet it remains unclear whether analogous behavioural structure can be observed in LLM-based decision systems. Here we examine this question using a controlled multi-model framework based on no-limit Texas Hold'em, where behaviour is quantified by Participation, measuring voluntary engagement in uncertain opportunities, and Proactiveness, measuring pre-flop risk escalation. Across homogeneous self-play and heterogeneous mixed-model interactions, frontier LLMs exhibit stable, model-specific risk profiles, forming a spectrum from conservative to aggressive decision styles. These profiles remain largely robust under changing opponent composition, while the most conservative and most aggressive models diverge further in mixed settings. Under global risk pressure and personal resource constraint, models adapt in structured but heterogeneous ways, ranging from broad behavioural contraction to selective de-escalation and near-invariant behaviour. These findings suggest that LLMs differ not only in baseline risk disposition, but also in the risk signals they respond to and the flexibility with which they adjust, providing a behavioural basis for auditing risk-sensitive decision-making in interactive settings. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/XuankunRong/AgentTexasPoker.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.NIcs.AI2026-07-20

Human Grounded Evaluation of Large Language Models for Optical Network Automation

Kiarash Rezaei, Omran Ayoub, Paolo Monti, Carlos Natalino

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted for network automation, yet their output quality and inference cost can vary substantially across LLM families. We present HuGLEN, a stepwise evaluation pipeline that uses an LLM-as-a-judge together with a small set of expert…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-20

WuYu-EnvLE-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Environmental Law Enforcement

Ziliang Yang, Yi Zhang, Kaijun Lin, Jiachao Ke, Haihong Xu, Zongguo Wen

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly considered for environmental enforcement, but their ability to produce traceable enforcement decisions remains unclear. We introduce WuYu-EnvLE-Bench, a benchmark built from real enforcement cases, regulatory standards, and expert rev…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-21

Prompt Design at Scale: How Format, Instruction Count, and Context Length Shape Instruction Adherence and Hallucination in Large Language Models

Netanel Eliav

Practitioners make three prompt-design decisions with almost no controlled evidence behind them: how to format instructions and context (markdown, plain text, prose, or tabular), how many simultaneous instructions a system prompt can carry before compliance degrades, and how much…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.HC2026-07-16

Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Scientific Visualization Literacy

Patrick Phuoc Do, Chau M. Ta, Chaoli Wang

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used to interpret visualizations, yet current evaluations remain largely chart-centric and provide limited evidence of understanding of scientific visualization (SciVis). We benchmark six MLLMs on the scientific visualizat…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-19

Debate-on-Graph: Reliable and Adaptive Reasoning of Large Language Model on Uncertain Knowledge Graph

Peiji Yu, Xin Chen, Tianxing Wu

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing. However, LLMs often suffer from hallucinations and lack of relevant knowledge when dealing with question answering (QA) tasks. To mitigate these issues, knowledge graphs (KGs) h…

View free PDFSource page