CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-06-28

On the Nonlinearity of Learning Rate Scaling for LLM Training

Zaiwen Yang, Huaqing Zhang, Jing Xu, Jingzhao Zhang

Learning-rate transfer can reduce the cost of training large language models: instead of sweeping learning rates at target scale, practitioners extrapolate from smaller runs. Existing approaches often assume that the optimal learning rate follows a log-linear scaling law in data scale and model size. We carefully examine and evaluate this scaling law. In our empirical study of GPT-2--style models from 22M to 707M parameters trained on 5B to 100B tokens, the optimal learning rate develops upward curvature at larger scales, leading to inaccurate extrapolation. We find that this curvature largely disappears when learning rates are replaced by effective learning rate (the step size in normalized weight space), and when data $D$ extrapolation is used instead of model size $N$ extrapolation. Next, we explain nonlinearity in scaling: weight-norm converges to equilibrium slower when optimal learning is small, requiring a larger step size to reduce the transient phase. Experiments with AdamH, which directly controls the effective learning rate, further support this explanation.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-01

Staleness-Learning Rate Scaling Laws for Asynchronous RLHF

Jingwei Song, Haofeng Xu, Jie Xiao, Chengke Bao, Jingwei Shi, Pengbin Feng, et al.

High-throughput RLHF systems often decouple rollout generation from policy optimization, leading to the use of stale rollouts during learner updates. In this work, we study the effect of such staleness in asynchronous GRPO. We make the behavior policy explicit in the GRPO surroga…

View free PDFSource page
arxivq-bio.QMcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-09

TheBioCollection: Unified Pre-Training Scale LLM Corpus for Biology

Hyunjin Seo, Hyeon Hwang, Gyubok Lee, Jay Shin, Jimin Park, Taesoo Kim, et al.

The push toward large language models for biology (BioLM) has created a need for training corpora that can endow models with a genuine understanding of biology. However, existing biological resources, such as molecular databases, protein repositories, genomic annotations, single-…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-19

Distilled Reinforcement Learning for LLM Post-training

Chen Wang, Zhaochun Li, Jionghao Bai, Yining Zhang, Hexuan Deng, Ge Lan, et al.

Large language model (LLM) post-training is essential for improving reasoning, adaptation, and alignment. Existing methods mainly follow two paradigms: reinforcement learning (RL) and on-policy distillation (OPD). However, RL relies on coarse-grained outcome supervision, resultin…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CR2026-06-26

TRACE: Trajectory-Based Safety Patch Learning for LLM Post-Training Realignment

Changyue Li, Jiaming He, Youliang Yuan, Jialin Wu, Boxi Yu, Zhicong Huang, et al.

Fine-Tuning-as-a-Service (FTaaS) platforms let users train large language models (LLMs) on customized tasks, but this pipeline could erode models' safety alignment. In practice, service providers need to recover models' safety without re-running full alignment, or destroying the…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-13

SOAP, Muon, and Beyond: Pushing LLM Pretraining Scales

Mikail Khona, Aditya Vavre, Boxiang Wang, Deyu Fu, Hao Wu, Mike Chrzanowski, et al.

Higher-order optimizers such as Muon and SOAP offer faster convergence than AdamW, but their computational cost and numerical stability challenges have limited adoption at scale. In this work, we adapt and enhance preconditioned gradient methods to overcome the practical challeng…

View free PDFSource page